From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Aug 6 21:47:27 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA23050 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Thu, 6 Aug 1998 21:47:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (sri-gw.MT.net [206.127.105.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA23045 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 1998 21:47:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@mt.sri.com) Received: from mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by ns.mt.sri.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id WAA17383; Thu, 6 Aug 1998 22:47:09 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate@rocky.mt.sri.com) Received: by mt.sri.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id WAA16202; Thu, 6 Aug 1998 22:47:07 -0600 Date: Thu, 6 Aug 1998 22:47:07 -0600 Message-Id: <199808070447.WAA16202@mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: joelh@gnu.org Cc: nate@mt.sri.com, tlambert@primenet.com, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Heads up on LFS In-Reply-To: <199808062321.SAA01224@detlev.UUCP> References: <19980806112955.A4299@reilly.home> <199808060606.XAA22855@usr09.primenet.com> <199808061438.IAA12182@mt.sri.com> <199808062321.SAA01224@detlev.UUCP> X-Mailer: VM 6.29 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org [ moved to -chat ] > > I know, I've tried and have benchmarks to prove it. Using 100% of > > the CPU for minutes at a time, I still get the GC kicking in using > > Sun's JVM implementation. (The M$ implementation is notorious for > > doing bad things since it uses a different reaping technology, so > > it's much less useful for programs that make heavy use of 'new'.) > > Is there some sort of irony in M$ not working well with memory-hungry > programs? It's not necessarily memory-hungry programs, but highly dynamic programs. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message