From owner-freebsd-mobile Tue Jan 20 17:21:07 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA26110 for freebsd-mobile-outgoing; Tue, 20 Jan 1998 17:21:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from afs.ntc.mita.keio.ac.jp (afs.ntc.mita.keio.ac.jp [131.113.212.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA26088 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 1998 17:20:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hosokawa@ntc.keio.ac.jp) Received: (from hosokawa@localhost) by afs.ntc.mita.keio.ac.jp (8.8.8+2.7Wbeta7/3.6Wbeta6-ntc_mailserver1.03) id KAA17757; Wed, 21 Jan 1998 10:20:37 +0900 (JST) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 1998 10:20:37 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <199801210120.KAA17757@afs.ntc.mita.keio.ac.jp> To: trost@cloud.rain.com Cc: mobile@FreeBSD.ORG, hosokawa@ntc.keio.ac.jp Subject: Re: problems with SVEC NE2000 clone In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 20 Jan 1998 16:53:56 -0800". From: hosokawa@ntc.keio.ac.jp (HOSOKAWA Tatsumi) X-Mailer: mnews [version 1.20] 1996-12/08(Sun) Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In article trost@cloud.rain.com writes: >> HOSOKAWA Tatsumi writes: >> In article >> trost@cloud.rain.com writes: >> >> >> card "PMX " "PE-200" >> >> config 0x1b "ed0" 10 >> config 0x1 "ed0" >> >> No joy, even with the irq present. It was one that I had tried. It seems like >> 0x1 "should" be the right config entry. I don't understand.... sorry. config 0x1 "ed0" 10 is the correct entry. >> >> ether 0xff0 >> ether 0x7f0 >> >> Why did you recommend this? It doesn't seem to make any difference, but I was >> wondering why you suggested the change. This card seems to be an OEM of PREMAX PMX-200 card, and this card has MAC address at 0x7f0 of attribute memory. -- HOSOKAWA, Tatsumi Network Technology Center Keio University hosokawa@ntc.keio.ac.jp