From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun 15 14:15:24 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DBF716A41C;
	Wed, 15 Jun 2005 14:15:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vd@datamax.bg)
Received: from jengal.datamax.bg (jengal.datamax.bg [82.103.104.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D47343D53;
	Wed, 15 Jun 2005 14:15:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vd@datamax.bg)
Received: from sinanica.bg.datamax (sinanica.bg.datamax [192.168.10.1])
	by jengal.datamax.bg (Postfix) with QMQP
	id B81CC87CD; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 17:15:22 +0300 (EEST)
Received: (nullmailer pid 57057 invoked by uid 1004);
	Wed, 15 Jun 2005 14:15:22 -0000
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 17:15:22 +0300
From: Vasil Dimov <vd@datamax.bg>
To: Roman Bogorodskiy <novel@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20050615141522.GA56921@sinanica.bg.datamax>
References: <200506150750.j5F7oJvB008881@freefall.freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-action=pgp-signed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200506150750.j5F7oJvB008881@freefall.freebsd.org>
X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/82235: New port: mail/mutt-ng
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: vd@datamax.bg
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 14:15:24 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 07:50:19AM +0000, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
> 
>  in mail/mutt-devel. Personally I think project doesn't deserve to
>  be called "ng" just because of integrating a bunch of third-party
>  patches.

I agree with that, it shouldnt be named -ng. Probably -nt for "not
tested" or "new technology" is more suitable.

I have been using mutt-devel for years and it has NEVER crashed, nor I
have noticed any lack of features.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFCsDf6Fw6SP/bBpCARAv09AJ9Nut5BR5TdRA22465HrPMAnvePyQCfURj5
EOyScO6ZbaqI+radpa1ZeYE=
=0/wL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----