From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 6 12:40:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C8A816A46B for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 12:40:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEE1913C45E for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 12:40:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.28]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 06 Jun 2007 08:40:05 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.3-GA) with ESMTP id ITF32936; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 08:40:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 209-6-203-248.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.203.248]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 06 Jun 2007 08:40:01 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18022.43800.708483.739950@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 08:39:52 -0400 To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <86ps49l5pc.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <86ps49l5pc.fsf@dwp.des.no> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: Subject: Re: Intel C2D COREs not used equally in FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 12:40:05 -0000 Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav writes: > > In practice there's (almost) only one reason not to run > > FreeBSD/amd64 on amd64-capable hardware: If you depend > > on a certain piece of software which is known not to run > > correctly in 64bit mode. Fortunately those are not many. > > The only one I can think of (for a desktop) is the Flash plugin. The last time I looked - a couple of months ago - I believe mplayer was also not yet there. Robert Huff