From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 31 08:04:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FA5E106564A; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:04:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from listlog2011@gmail.com) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 481DD8FC0A; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:04:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0V8460T003064; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:04:15 GMT (envelope-from listlog2011@gmail.com) Message-ID: <4F27A076.60009@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:04:06 +0800 From: David Xu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: igor References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org, bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/156567: [kqueue] [patch] Add EV_CLEAR to AIO events in kqueue X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: davidxu@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:04:16 -0000 On 2012/1/31 4:47, igor wrote: > > > Dear all, > > What can I do to get my patch finally applied or > rejected (hope not :) ? My PR is not even assigned to anyone. Should I > do my best to become a committer (how? :-) ? > > The solution I propose > finally allows to use kqueue with aio in multi-threaded applications. > The only reason I created it is because I wanted to use it for myself > and it worked flawlessly. > > Please, anyone? > It is better to allocate a member field from struct sigevent for kevent flags, we have spare fields available there, please check the union _sigev_un. Regards, David Xu