From owner-freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 18:58:04 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B251815; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 18:58:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx5.roble.com (mx5.roble.com [206.40.34.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx5.roble.com", Issuer "mx5.roble.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38FAB1E9; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 18:58:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 10:58:03 -0800 (PST) From: Roger Marquis To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Enumerating glibc dependencies In-Reply-To: References: <20150202150721.E8553209@hub.freebsd.org> <20150202152243.GA29176@in-addr.com> <20150202164319.GL11558@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 18:58:04 -0000 > Is FreeBSD glib always linked to libc (vs glibc)? Apparently it is, at least on the systems I've tested where there were no glibc dependencies at all. Another item added to the list of BSD (security) advantages. Roger