From owner-freebsd-chat  Tue Jul 27  4:38: 0 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26FAA1532F
	for <chat@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 27 Jul 1999 04:37:57 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no)
Received: (from des@localhost)
	by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.1) id NAA38738;
	Tue, 27 Jul 1999 13:37:37 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from des)
To: Rod Taylor <dark@idiotswitch.org>
Cc: "Francisco Reyes" <francisco@natserv.com>,
	FreeBSd Chat list <chat@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD essentials
References: <199907271113.HAA00417@vulcan.addy.com> <99072707323300.76617@a11.idiotswitch.org>
From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>
Date: 27 Jul 1999 13:37:36 +0200
In-Reply-To: Rod Taylor's message of "Tue, 27 Jul 1999 07:29:32 -0400"
Message-ID: <xzpoggy4933.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
Lines: 11
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Rod Taylor <dark@idiotswitch.org> writes:
> Whelp... You could use the IP and block it from voting again for 2
> hours or something. This would allow dynamic people to both vote
> (should they get the ip), and wouldn't allow one person to load it
> up very quickly.

Consider how many -chat readers work for (or are) ISPs.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message