From owner-freebsd-chat  Thu May 15 11:58:14 1997
Return-Path: <owner-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA07618
          for chat-outgoing; Thu, 15 May 1997 11:58:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from andrsn.stanford.edu (root@andrsn.Stanford.EDU [36.33.0.163])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA07613
          for <chat@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 15 May 1997 11:58:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (andrsn@localhost.Stanford.EDU [127.0.0.1]) by andrsn.stanford.edu (8.8.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id LAA26017; Thu, 15 May 1997 11:57:58 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 15 May 1997 11:57:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: Annelise Anderson <andrsn@andrsn.stanford.edu>
To: Joel Ray Holveck <joelh@gnu.ai.mit.edu>
cc: perhaps@yes.no, chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Reply-to addresses
In-Reply-To: <199705151639.MAA26073@ethanol.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.94.970515115453.25988A-100000@andrsn.stanford.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

I really like getting a reply from a message I post sent to me
as well as to the list.  The replies sent to me arrive much more
quickly and are sorted differently, into a mailbox that has only
"personal" messages and, of course, spam.

I don't even mind the spam--I think it's unfortunate that the
"list" command has been disabled and suggests that the bad guys
are winning.

Annelise