From owner-freebsd-net  Sat Jan  8  8: 3: 3 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from cs.rice.edu (cs.rice.edu [128.42.1.30])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2DCB15958
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Sat,  8 Jan 2000 08:02:52 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from aron@cs.rice.edu)
Received: (from aron@localhost)
	by cs.rice.edu (8.9.0/8.9.0) id KAA11960;
	Sat, 8 Jan 2000 10:02:25 -0600 (CST)
From: Mohit Aron <aron@cs.rice.edu>
Message-Id: <200001081602.KAA11960@cs.rice.edu>
Subject: Re: performance of FreeBSD-current as SMP
To: alex@big.endian.de (Alexander Langer)
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2000 10:02:25 -0600 (CST)
Cc: weyrich@goodnet.com, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <20000108134110.B442@cichlids.cichlids.com> from "Alexander Langer" at Jan 8, 2000 01:41:10 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


> 
> An OS cannot make use of two or more prozessors, if you only use one
> process and/or one thread for all stuff.
> 
> You should at least create a new thread for every answer.
> 


Good Lord! This is the second time now. I even SAID in my last two mails that
there is only ONE processor. Theortically then, FreeBSD configured with/without
SMP support shouldn't make any difference.




- Mohit


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message