From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon May 16 01:28:05 2011
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
	id 5DC39106566B; Mon, 16 May 2011 01:28:05 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 01:28:05 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
Message-ID: <20110516012805.GA88914@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201105140021.p4E0LlP7029193@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20110514082018.GC97304@FreeBSD.org>
	<alpine.LNX.2.00.1105150744430.28608@gerinyyl>
	<20110515155920.GB19328@FreeBSD.org>
	<20110515180819.GB29366@lonesome.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20110515180819.GB29366@lonesome.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>,
	cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/emulators/wine Makefile distinfo pkg-plist
	ports/emulators/wine/files patch-dlls-wineoss.drv
X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree <cvs-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 01:28:05 -0000

On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 01:08:19PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 03:59:20PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > Carefully selected and reasonable defaults is one of the strong sides
> > of ports (and thus packages) that we offer, despite all aforementioned
> > drawbacks.
> 
> User feedback at the last 2 conferences that I have been to, is that we
> are insufficiently consistent in our defaults.  (In particular, X11 and
> CUPS are frequently mentioned as offenders; there are others.)  This
> primarily affects our default-built packages.

I would say there is only minor CUPS inconsistency (most of the times it
is correctly disabled; few remaining ports should be converted I think);
for X11 it's a bit more tricky: roughly, if a port is likely enough to
be used in non-X11 environment (or it's a server only thing), no X11
support by default seems reasonable for package.  Otherwise having X11
dependency is natural, since those bits would be installed by 99% of
desktop users anyways.

./danfe