From owner-freebsd-gnome Thu Jan 3 19:50:19 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFB5B37B419 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 19:50:03 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g043o3932899; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 19:50:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 19:50:03 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200201040350.g043o3932899@freefall.freebsd.org> To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: "David W. Chapman Jr." Subject: Re: ports/33521: mozilla port doesn't build irc client ChatZilla Reply-To: "David W. Chapman Jr." Sender: owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG The following reply was made to PR ports/33521; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "David W. Chapman Jr." To: "Steve Wills" Cc: Subject: Re: ports/33521: mozilla port doesn't build irc client ChatZilla Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 21:46:11 -0600 I believe someone already submitted a patch for the knob, but we'll leave it to the maintainer to decide which. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Wills" To: "David W. Chapman Jr." Cc: Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 9:44 PM Subject: Re: ports/33521: mozilla port doesn't build irc client ChatZilla > Ok, thanks for the info on make.conf. Whats the verdict on this change? > Default to building ChatZilla, or make it a knob? Either way is fine with me, > but why not at least give it a try as a default and if its a problem or people > complain, then make it a knob? > > Thanks, > Steve > > On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 07:49:14PM -0600, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: > > > Thats fine with me, I can add it to my pkgtools.conf file to always pass > > that > > > flag, so its not big deal. However, according to the mozilla developers, > > > chatzilla is nothing more than about 78k of JavaScript and XUL. From my > > > experience, it doesn't add a great deal of time to the build or the on > > disk or > > > in memory images. Whats your reasoning behind making it optional? > > > > > I wasn't aware that it was that small. Eventhough some people still might > > want it an option instead of default, since its not a default in the first > > place. Actually you could add it to your /etc/make.conf so that anytime you > > build it from wherever it would use those knobs. > > > > -- > The difference between fiction and reality is that fiction makes sense. > -- Tom Clancy > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message