From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 14 12:02:16 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13BA737B401 for ; Wed, 14 May 2003 12:02:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 208D943F3F for ; Wed, 14 May 2003 12:02:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4EJ2DYP058989 for ; Wed, 14 May 2003 21:02:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) To: current@freebsd.org From: Poul-Henning Kamp Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 21:02:13 +0200 Message-ID: <58988.1052938933@critter.freebsd.dk> Subject: Missing break in switch in nfsserver code ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 19:02:16 -0000 FlexeLint warned me that there was a switch fall-through here. Can anybody say if this is intentional, or if a break is missing ? If it is intentional, we should make it with "/* fall through */" Poul-Henning Index: nfsserver/nfs_syscalls.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/nfsserver/nfs_syscalls.c,v retrieving revision 1.87 diff -u -r1.87 nfs_syscalls.c --- nfsserver/nfs_syscalls.c 2 Mar 2003 16:54:39 -0000 1.87 +++ nfsserver/nfs_syscalls.c 14 May 2003 19:00:36 -0000 @@ -457,6 +457,7 @@ nfsrvstats.srvrpccnt[nd->nd_procnum]++; nfsrv_updatecache(nd, TRUE, mreq); nd->nd_mrep = NULL; + /* XXX: missing break ?? */ case RC_REPLY: siz = m_length(mreq, NULL); if (siz <= 0 || siz > NFS_MAXPACKET) { -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.