From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 6 07:00:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45BE41065670 for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2012 07:00:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nm.knife@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4A678FC15 for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2012 07:00:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhq7 with SMTP id hq7so235222wib.13 for ; Fri, 06 Apr 2012 00:00:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=TAwZ7ZC2uEY5McDCWccIDBgOzPk4KdlSv8nFczVpIyQ=; b=mHp8yGiEG2psrflNDGPF1yS/cLknYAk8Hj2IzdNqaYYFcWj6V4rjgsUoXYleHgMJM3 JnHihpKNGrZCYTJcYmgoLv0RZSgthNo6b6LbBSXIYKUS5YYlXflo9bS7GV1GQn8ADWaK uZiUXCU83DEhTpwWMeTiWqXv6f0XqjIl/HPz9BlZnn3hohseZ3EsLrpWxgNRtMqcL75z SOh8xKFxV7VfOsPduZ63a/Fv5FLgs57NO6p+sQ/YMzybE700hf8oxER+oZ6eac15cTMD sI20RwUt8HJT8X0qfK84tAniL8Pm4QIs5YI/Hui5Z2dZbUGgYxvRNrLTWxrh+xyL0pag LhRg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.103.134 with SMTP id fw6mr20296854wib.0.1333695632965; Fri, 06 Apr 2012 00:00:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.58.68 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Apr 2012 00:00:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 00:00:32 -0700 Message-ID: From: =?windows-1251?B?y/7h7uzo8CDD8Ojj7vDu4g==?= To: Bernhard Schmidt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel 1000-N is really slow X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 07:00:34 -0000 Well I don't know what it is, but 1mbit was back again. I did some magic, changed my channel from 5 to 6, stopped and stared wlan0 and it went back into the 48 54 range. BTW I am pasting part of the log in case it is any help Apr 5 23:56:19 LGX kernel: wlan0: [28:16:2e:da:02:f9] AMRR decreasing rate 72 (txcnt=122 retrycnt=43) Apr 5 23:56:25 LGX kernel: wlan0: [28:16:2e:da:02:f9] AMRR increasing rate 96 (txcnt=140 retrycnt=11) Apr 5 23:56:38 LGX kernel: wlan0: [28:16:2e:da:02:f9] AMRR increasing rate 108 (txcnt=130 retrycnt=12) Apr 5 23:56:51 LGX kernel: wlan0: [28:16:2e:da:02:f9] AMRR decreasing rate 96 (txcnt=130 retrycnt=58) Apr 5 23:56:54 LGX sudo: alakazam : TTY=pts/0 ; PWD=/usr/home/alakazam ; USER=root ; COMMAND=/sbin/ifconfig -ht Apr 5 23:56:55 LGX kernel: wlan0: [28:16:2e:da:02:f9] AMRR increasing rate 108 (txcnt=137 retrycnt=8) Apr 5 23:57:25 LGX kernel: wlan0: [28:16:2e:da:02:f9] AMRR decreasing rate 96 (txcnt=137 retrycnt=47) Apr 5 23:57:32 LGX kernel: wlan0: [28:16:2e:da:02:f9] AMRR increasing rate 108 (txcnt=124 retrycnt=11) Apr 5 23:58:00 LGX kernel: wlan0: [28:16:2e:da:02:f9] AMRR decreasing rate 96 (txcnt=14 retrycnt=7) Apr 5 23:58:02 LGX kernel: wlan0: [28:16:2e:da:02:f9] AMRR increasing rate 108 (txcnt=21 retrycnt=0) Also, is there a way to force 54mbits? I don't care for the extra little power it takes. I am disappointed, because I got the 3x3 antenna to avoid issues like this. Looks like I should have opted for the webcam. -- Lyubomir Grigorov (bgalakazam)