From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 17 12:58:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9E6216A4CE for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 12:58:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from magnesium.net (toxic.magnesium.net [207.154.84.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8402643D48 for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 12:58:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from adamw@magnesium.net) Received: (qmail 75557 invoked by uid 1252); 17 Apr 2004 19:58:32 -0000 Date: 17 Apr 2004 15:58:32 -0400 Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 15:58:32 -0400 From: Adam Weinberger To: Nick Christenson Message-ID: <20040417195832.GC41802@toxic.magnesium.net> References: <20040417193013.GB41802@toxic.magnesium.net> <200404171949.i3HJnIAG010365@prometheus.gangofone.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200404171949.i3HJnIAG010365@prometheus.gangofone.com> X-Editor: Vim 6.2 http://www.vim.org X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5 http://www.mutt.org X-URL: http://www.vectors.cx X-ASL: 6/m/behind you User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade failed on gedit X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 19:58:32 -0000 >> (04.17.2004 @ 1549 PST): Nick Christenson said, in 1.0K: << > > Did you follow the upgrade instructions at: > > http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/faq26.html > > Nope. > > > If not, any messiness that exists, you've brought upon yourself. > > > > As you can see below, gtksourceview and libgnomeprintui haven't been > > upgraded yet. Please follow the directions in the webpage referenced > > above, or at least run 'portupgrade -a' instead of just upgrading > > applications and skipping the libraries...... > > Uh, maybe it's just me, but if gedit2 requires the upgrade of the > libraries, shouldn't they get upgraded automatically if I run > "portupgrade -rR" like I did? > > No need for a response. I thought I was doing you guys a favor. >> end of "Re: portupgrade failed on gedit" from Nick Christenson << Unfortunately, this is a problem generated specifically by the GNOME upgrade. New dependencies were introduced in the new version of Gedit2. portupgrade -rR only updates the libraries that were previously depended upon for Gedit2. portupgrade isn't currently smart enough to check for new dependencies. That's exactly what the upgrade script is there to manage. Other than upgrading stuff in a couple runs and having failures each time, it lets you do it all in one shot. I don't know of any better way to handle the upgrade. This will surely be a problem in future releases too, so if you know of any way to make the process run smoother, please do let us know. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@magnesium.net || adamw@FreeBSD.org adamw@vectors.cx || adamw@gnome.org http://www.vectors.cx