From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 5 23:52:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6893106564A for ; Sat, 5 Nov 2011 23:52:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpuburner@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 508608FC0C for ; Sat, 5 Nov 2011 23:52:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by faar19 with SMTP id r19so5783817faa.13 for ; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 16:52:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=W2jdg2FoJmRcwJqsBxQJXM5mZwj1jhSyWHo/TWLTz1o=; b=lp0FLXtG/IeCiGj90fzBADvjMHcpUn3MO1RAorWyKt19UFWrdww3tfXzEHzMCIwX1M dEfXaU3NIXMABy8UA++FX8A9mv3PApM9h+XVl1a5bIgtn8DBlPHw6ralLxVMS5g7MXAX mAkFoTc3ex0k7Oh4dgvXxbClDmPdi8Zbd89Uc= Received: by 10.223.5.201 with SMTP id 9mr35786704faw.5.1320537125103; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 16:52:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.96.200 with HTTP; Sat, 5 Nov 2011 16:51:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <44d3d6paww.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <44ty6insu2.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> From: Chris Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2011 19:51:44 -0400 Message-ID: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: recursive copy with spaces in descendants X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2011 23:52:06 -0000 On a hunch, I gave the following a shot: tar -cvlf - '/usr/local/etc/transmission/home/Downloads'/ | split -a 2 -b 3900m - /mnt/usb/TX_DL.tar. which created a split tar archive of the files on /mnt/usb. I'm still thinking there's something with the source path/file names that the msdosfs driver on BSD doesn't like, but at least this way is usable for the intended scenario. I guess I'll call this solved unless you all have some insight as to why the original method wasn't working. Thanks for all the help so far!