From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 1 21:59:11 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39DBF106564A for ; Sat, 1 Nov 2008 21:59:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from craig001@lerwick.hopto.org) Received: from lerwick.hopto.org (81-178-20-70.dsl.pipex.com [81.178.20.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 66DB58FC14 for ; Sat, 1 Nov 2008 21:59:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from craig001@lerwick.hopto.org) Received: (qmail 51588 invoked by uid 98); 1 Nov 2008 21:58:05 +0000 Received: from 192.168.0.2 by polaris.lerwick.hopto.org (envelope-from , uid 82) with qmail-scanner-2.01 (clamdscan: 0.88.4/1789. hbedv: 7.1.1.11/6.35.1.178. f-prot: 4.6.6/3.16.14. spamassassin: 3.1.4. Clear:RC:1(192.168.0.2):. Processed in 6.060786 secs); 01 Nov 2008 21:58:05 -0000 Received: from main.lerwick.hopto.org (HELO ?192.168.0.2?) (192.168.0.2) by lerwick.hopto.org with SMTP; 1 Nov 2008 21:57:58 +0000 From: Craig Butler To: Mark Linimon In-Reply-To: <20081031131827.GA9613@soaustin.net> References: <20081031124442.GB9102@soaustin.net> <183638.12752.qm@web56802.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <20081031131827.GA9613@soaustin.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2008 21:59:00 +0000 Message-Id: <1225576740.92270.2.camel@main.lerwick.hopto.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Free Ultra2 in Silicon Valley, USA X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2008 21:59:11 -0000 On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 08:18 -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 06:02:28AM -0700, mdh wrote: > > A dual CPU Ultra2 is going to be a lot more powerful than an Ultra5. > > Hmm, ok, didn't know that. If no-one else claims it first, perhaps > I can claim it for the build cluster and pull one of the Ultra 5s. > I intend to be out in .ca.us for meetBSD. > > > E4500's can be relatively beefy. > > We could have gotten our hands on some more of them in .ca.us but the > problem is who wants to pay for the power :-( Really, their time has > come and gone. > > > OK, this is probably way over my head, but I'll bite - what exactly > > happens if you don't breakpoint through it? > > http://people.freebsd.org/~linimon/studies/dmesgs/dmesg.netra_1_t200.txt . > > This appears to be some kind of race condition; my guess from fooling > around with it is that some interrupt is enabled, and then fires, before > the setup to handle it is finished. (Note that the same kernel runs > fine on the 100s). By stepping through it, you can see it fail at > different locations; without stepping through it, it is always at > the same. > > Unfortunately my notes are at home and that machine is unreachable ATM. > > mcl > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-sparc64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Guys, I be prepared to pay for delivery to the UK (as long as its reasonable) and can put it in me rack next to the other build servers if you like. How heavy is an ultra 2 ? Regards Craig B