From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 9 13:00:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BCF016A402 for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2007 13:00:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC7313C428 for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2007 13:00:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l19D0cVN085851 for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2007 13:00:38 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l19D0cDf085844; Fri, 9 Feb 2007 13:00:38 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 13:00:38 GMT Message-Id: <200702091300.l19D0cDf085844@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: "Bruce M. Simpson" Cc: Subject: Re: bin/54274: udp-proxy support is not implemented in libalias X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Bruce M. Simpson" List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 13:00:38 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/54274; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Bruce M. Simpson" To: Nicolai Petri Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, piso@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/54274: udp-proxy support is not implemented in libalias Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 12:50:46 +0000 Nicolai Petri wrote: > Bruce M Simpson wrote: >> Synopsis: udp-proxy support is not implemented in libalias >> >> State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback >> State-Changed-By: bms >> State-Changed-When: Fri Feb 9 04:01:54 UTC 2007 >> State-Changed-Why: looks like something like this got committed since >> 5.x >> can you confirm? >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=54274 > > I quickly browsed the code and it doesn't seem like it's implemented. > Doing an udp proxy on port 53 was my initial reason for this feature > and I cannot see how that could work with the current code. > > I can update the patch if needed but I don't expect many differences. > If you could do that, and submit the patch to: 1. this PR, 2. myself, and 3. Paolo Pisati (Cc'd) I'd greatly appreciate it, it will help to get the feature into the tree. Kind regards BMS