From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 12 22:40:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 027E116A41F; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 22:40:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org) Received: from postfix4-1.free.fr (postfix4-1.free.fr [213.228.0.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23B5543DA5; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 22:40:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org) Received: from tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (vol75-8-82-233-239-98.fbx.proxad.net [82.233.239.98]) by postfix4-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEDCC317FB6; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 00:40:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: by tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EDFF9405B; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 00:40:55 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 00:40:55 +0200 From: Jeremie Le Hen To: Max Laier Message-ID: <20050812224055.GF45385@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> References: <1123858936.22864.252.camel@torgau.office.netline.net.uk> <1123861547.22864.256.camel@torgau.office.netline.net.uk> <200508121751.27737.max@love2party.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200508121751.27737.max@love2party.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: Andrew Thompson , freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bridge and PF X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 22:40:58 -0000 Hi, > This is not true. As Scott suggested try if_bridge in 6.0 which has both > IPv6 > and full pf support. Additionally, pf is supported by the old bridge just > use the same settings you would use for ipf. The old bridge does not allow > for stateful filtering however. The same is true for ipf and ipfw with the > old bridge code. Does if_bridge generally support PF_HOOKS (thus one can use ipfw), or is it strictly bound to pf ? Thanks. Regards, -- Jeremie Le Hen < jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >