From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jun 18 13:37:37 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 743AB106564A
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:37:37 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org)
Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 471EB8FC21
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:37:37 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org)
Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (66.111.2.69.static.nyinternet.net
	[66.111.2.69])
	by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F317C46BC0;
	Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:37:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from jhbbsd.hudson-trading.com (unknown [209.249.190.8])
	by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EFF738A075;
	Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:37:35 -0400 (EDT)
From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:09:33 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7
References: <permail-20090617182925f0889e8400003062-a_best01@message-id.uni-muenster.de>
In-Reply-To: <permail-20090617182925f0889e8400003062-a_best01@message-id.uni-muenster.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200906180909.33511.jhb@freebsd.org>
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1
	(bigwig.baldwin.cx); Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:37:36 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.1 at bigwig.baldwin.cx
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=4.2 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE
	autolearn=no version=3.2.5
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on bigwig.baldwin.cx
Cc: Alexander Best <alexbestms@math.uni-muenster.de>
Subject: Re: estX still not attaching properly
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:37:37 -0000

On Wednesday 17 June 2009 2:29:25 pm Alexander Best wrote:
> hi there,
> 
> although i'm running a very recent current which has "ACPICA 20090521", estX
> still isn't attaching properly on my machine:
> 
> est0: <Enhanced SpeedStep Frequency Control> on cpu0
> est: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but is not recognized.
> est: cpu_vendor GenuineIntel, msr 925092506000925
> device_attach: est0 attach returned 6
> est1: <Enhanced SpeedStep Frequency Control> on cpu1
> est: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but is not recognized.
> est: cpu_vendor GenuineIntel, msr 925092506000925
> device_attach: est1 attach returned 6

That just means ACPI isn't providing info about the speed steppings your CPU 
provides.  It is odd that cpu0 has freq_levels but cpu1 does not.

-- 
John Baldwin