From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 16 18:48:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 462F316A4CE for ; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 18:48:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from limicola.its.uu.se (limicola.its.UU.SE [130.238.7.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19D3543D39 for ; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 18:48:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ante@Update.UU.SE) Received: by limicola.its.uu.se (Postfix, from userid 205) id 7A0094D10; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 20:37:47 +0200 (MSZ) Received: from limicola.its.uu.se(127.0.0.1) by limicola.its.uu.se via virus-scan id s2168; Sat, 16 Oct 04 20:37:40 +0200 Received: from Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE [130.238.19.25]) by limicola.its.uu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AAA14D0B; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 20:37:40 +0200 (MSZ) Received: by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix, from userid 30086) id 5516938012; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 20:37:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E375C002; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 20:37:40 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 20:37:40 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Davour To: Will Andrews In-Reply-To: <20041016181031.GM42886@hex.databits.net> Message-ID: References: <200410152156.16113.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <200410161331.01356.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <20041016130214.GK10363@k7.mavetju> <20041016181031.GM42886@hex.databits.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: alternative options for ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 18:48:57 -0000 On Sat, 16 Oct 2004, Will Andrews wrote: > Unfortunately, adding code for FLAVORS and friend is extremely > nontrivial. I looked into that a few times, and we would need to > more or less rewrite the whole functionality... and doing so in > make-ese is difficult, to say the least. Flavors? You are not talkign about the old object oriented lisp system, are you? /Andreas -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?