From owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 25 09:41:32 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2970D16A4B3; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 09:41:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from abigail.blackend.org (blackend.org [212.11.35.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FFB84401A; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 09:41:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marc@blackend.org) Received: from nosferatu.blackend.org (nosferatu.blackend.org [192.168.10.205]) by abigail.blackend.org (8.12.9/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h8PGf7Td034377; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 18:41:07 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc@abigail.blackend.org) Received: from nosferatu.blackend.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) h8PGeERE004897; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 18:40:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc@nosferatu.blackend.org) Received: (from marc@localhost) by nosferatu.blackend.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h8PGeD7B004896; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 18:40:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc) Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 18:40:13 +0200 From: Marc Fonvieille To: Ken Smith Message-ID: <20030925164013.GB574@nosferatu.blackend.org> References: <200309251252.h8PCq7Tc093693@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030925152525.GA410@daemon.li> <20030925162427.GA12579@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030925162427.GA12579@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Useless-Header: blackend.org X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org cc: Ken Smith cc: Josef El-Rayes Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/arch-handbook/driverbasics chapter.sgml X-BeenThere: cvs-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the doc and www trees List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 16:41:32 -0000 On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 12:24:28PM -0400, Ken Smith wrote: > > is there a special reason why we do this here? > > In this case there is a special reason - the whitespace adjustments > are visible to the users. I was adjusting whitespace inside of > a program example. Someone else mentioned this as well, I was > making it style(9) compliant. IMO if the people who watch over > the source code commits are going to "insist" on style(9) compliance > we should make an effort for the examples in the online documentation > to also be style(9) compliant. > > Should I phrase the commit log message in a different way if this > sort of thing happens again? Strictly speaking because the whitespace > changes are visible in the end result you could consider this a real > functional change. People tend to associate "whitespace change" > with "will be eaten by the SGML processors and makes no visible > change in the end result" but in cases like this that is not the case. > You were explicit enough IMHO in your log message. Heh no one noted you tested the driver code on a shinny sparc64! :)) Marc