From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 8 17:11:52 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FF9C89C for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 17:11:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@uffner.com) Received: from eris.uffner.com (eris.uffner.com [71.162.143.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6CEE2205 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 17:11:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from discordia.uffner.com (discordia.uffner.com [10.69.69.61]) (authenticated bits=0) by eris.uffner.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r98HBoTc047606 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 8 Oct 2013 13:11:50 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tom@uffner.com) Message-ID: <52543CD6.3000009@uffner.com> Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 13:11:50 -0400 From: Tom Uffner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:23.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/23.0 SeaMonkey/2.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: flo@smeets.im Subject: building seamonkey - possible clang bug Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 17:11:52 -0000 On Tue Oct 8 15:57:07 UTC 2013, Florian Smeets wrote: > You were out of swap space, that's why the compiler was killed. >> real memory = 268435456 (256 MB) >> avail memory = 248418304 (236 MB) > This is not nearly enough, I don't recall what how much a non debug > build needs right now, but i think it was close to 2-3GB. > You could add more swap, but that's not going to make it any faster :) Thanks. I realize this. in my message I mentioned that the failure mode was running out of memory. and that I added swap. What I failed to include was that (including swap) i had 3/4 G of VM the 1st time, and a bit over 2 G on the 2nd try. Is 2GB still not enough to compile ns_core.c, or is something else wrong? If possible I would prefer not to invest another week or more to find out that insufficient swap space wasn't the problem after all.