From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Mar 20 03:44:52 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D88FD1065670;
	Tue, 20 Mar 2012 03:44:52 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36])
	by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FA3F1500B3;
	Tue, 20 Mar 2012 03:44:52 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4F67FD38.7010006@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 20:44:56 -0700
From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1;
	rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Thunderbird/11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org>
References: <20120319075901.GA16256@snail.casa> <4F67BE27.7030400@FreeBSD.org>
	<4F67C74D.2080906@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4F67C74D.2080906@FreeBSD.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proposal for x11-wm/windowmaker
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 03:44:52 -0000

On 3/19/2012 4:54 PM, Ade Lovett wrote:
> On 3/19/2012 16:15, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 3/19/2012 12:59 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am attaching a "quick-and-dirty" patch that should reallow
>>> compilation of x11-wm/windowmaker under 7-STABLE.
>>>
>>> The problem seems to be the missing macro HAVE_SYS_SELECT_H; the patch
>>> just forces it in the configure script if a FreeBSD system is
>>> detected.
>>
>> I'm not opposed to adding that if someone can confirm that it allows
>> WindowMaker to compile on 7-stable.
> 
> Since it's for 7-stable only (apparently), it would be better off
> wrapped in an OSVERSION check to make things abundantly clear as to why
> it's being done.

Yes, I was planning to do that, but thanks for the suggestion in any case.


-- 

    This .signature sanitized for your protection