From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 19 17:01:51 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB1EA16A4CE; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 17:01:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU [128.205.32.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D6B843D41; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 17:01:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU) Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (kensmith@localhost [127.0.0.1]) j0JH1mIo005916; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:01:48 -0500 (EST) Received: (from kensmith@localhost) by electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id j0JH1ms9005915; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:01:48 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:01:47 -0500 From: Ken Smith To: John E Hein Message-ID: <20050119170147.GA5830@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> References: <200501191634.j0JGYRmI035360@freefall.freebsd.org> <16878.37150.483195.16826@gromit.timing.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <16878.37150.483195.16826@gromit.timing.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: emulation@freebsd.org cc: Ken Smith Subject: Re: ports/76260: ports/emulators/linux_base-8 installation failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 17:01:51 -0000 On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 09:55:58AM -0700, John E Hein wrote: > Ken Smith wrote at 16:34 GMT on Jan 19, 2005: > > Synopsis: ports/emulators/linux_base-8 installation failure > > > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > > State-Changed-By: kensmith > > State-Changed-When: Wed Jan 19 16:32:13 GMT 2005 > > State-Changed-Why: > > > > Another piece of the -current Linux kernel emulation was MFCed to > > RELENG_4 yesterday that seems to fix this. Scott has confirmed > > it fixed the problem for him. I'll merge it into RELENG_4_11 > > before the release. > > Will the addition of the extra syscall arg possibly break older linux > base installs when running with a 4.11 kernel? I'm hoping not. But we're at a point I don't think we have much of a choice. The older Linux base installs have been declared a security risk which was why the push for linux_base-8 to begin with. -- Ken Smith - From there to here, from here to | kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu there, funny things are everywhere. | - Theodore Geisel |