From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Feb 28 12:18:45 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from gw.nectar.com (gw.nectar.com [208.42.49.153]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F0D37B718; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:18:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nectar@nectar.com) Received: from hamlet.nectar.com (hamlet.nectar.com [10.0.1.102]) by gw.nectar.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AED418C91; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 14:18:39 -0600 (CST) Received: (from nectar@localhost) by hamlet.nectar.com (8.11.2/8.9.3) id f1SKIdL33094; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 14:18:39 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from nectar@spawn.nectar.com) Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 14:18:39 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: Maxim Sobolev Cc: "David O'Brien" , Christian Weisgerber , Steve Price , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ksh93 Message-ID: <20010228141838.B33017@hamlet.nectar.com> Mail-Followup-To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" , Maxim Sobolev , David O'Brien , Christian Weisgerber , Steve Price , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org References: <20010228112329.A9192@hamlet.nectar.com> <200102281813.f1SIDkR54747@vic.sabbo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200102281813.f1SIDkR54747@vic.sabbo.net>; from sobomax@FreeBSD.org on Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 08:12:33PM +0200 X-Url: http://www.nectar.com/ Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 08:12:33PM +0200, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > Well, ld.so could still break, and anyway you'd lose the ability to > > Probability of ld.so breakage is quite low, much lower than any of the > base libs, I guess I was thinking in terms of inaccessible /usr, which is the most common thing I've run into. -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message