From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 22 01:16:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22DAE16A420; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 01:16:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from murray@freebsdmall.com) Received: from mail.freebsdmall.com (69.50.233.168.ip.nectartech.com [69.50.233.168]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED1ED43D45; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 01:16:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from murray@freebsdmall.com) Received: by mail.freebsdmall.com (Postfix, from userid 2074) id A85FC1D746AC; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 17:16:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 17:16:22 -0800 From: Murray Stokely To: John Baldwin Message-ID: <20060222011622.GB11099@freebsdmall.com> References: <200602211929.k1LJTTAH060389@repoman.freebsd.org> <200602211556.34034.jhb@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200602211556.34034.jhb@freebsd.org> X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/0E451F7D X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: E2CA 411D DD44 53FD BB4B 3CB5 B4D7 10A2 0E45 1F7D User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: doc-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-doc@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, Joel Dahl Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/share/sgml includes.navdevelopers.sgml X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 01:16:25 -0000 On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 03:56:31PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > On Tuesday 21 February 2006 14:29, Joel Dahl wrote: > > joel 2006-02-21 19:29:29 UTC > > > > FreeBSD doc repository > > > > Modified files: > > share/sgml includes.navdevelopers.sgml > > Log: > > Ok, it's almost impossible to find the FreeBSD internal pages, so add a > > link to the bottom of the navigation table. > > I always thought the lack of a link was on purpose to be honest. Not there's > anything sUp3r secret under internal/. Agreed. It shouldn't be almost impossible but completely impossible. /internal pages have never been linked from the external pages on purpose. It is for internal communications just as the developers@ list is and not for public consumption. This assumption shouldn't be changed without a wider discussion. Please back this out. Is there individual content that is in internal that you think should be made more visible? The release engineering schedules, todo lists, and procedures used to live in internal but migrated to the public areas when I realized the much broader audience interested in that material. It is likely that other material may also be due for a migration into more public areas. - Murray