From owner-freebsd-ports  Wed Feb 28 12:37:14 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from blizzard.sabbo.net (smtp.sabbo.net [193.193.218.18])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id F0C1537B71B; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:37:04 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from max@vic.sabbo.net)
Received: from vic.sabbo.net (root@vic.sabbo.net [193.193.218.112])
	by blizzard.sabbo.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f1SKasg09843;
	Wed, 28 Feb 2001 22:36:58 +0200
Received: (from max@localhost)
	by vic.sabbo.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f1SKarb55568;
	Wed, 28 Feb 2001 22:36:53 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org)
From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>
Message-Id: <200102282036.f1SKarb55568@vic.sabbo.net>
Subject: Re: ksh93
To: n@nectar.com (Jacques A. Vidrine)
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 22:36:42 +0200 (EET)
Cc: sobomax@FreeBSD.org (Maxim Sobolev),
	obrien@FreeBSD.org (David O'Brien),
	naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber),
	steve@FreeBSD.org (Steve Price), freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <20010228141838.B33017@hamlet.nectar.com> from "Jacques A. Vidrine" at Feb 28, 2001 02:18:39 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

> 
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 08:12:33PM +0200, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > > Well, ld.so could still break, and anyway you'd lose the ability to
> > 
> > Probability of ld.so breakage is quite low, much lower than any of the
> > base libs, 
> 
> I guess I was thinking in terms of inaccessible /usr, which is the
> most common thing I've run into.

Well, inaccessible /usr excludes possibility to log-in remotely
(inetd lives in /usr as well as demons from /usr/libexec). Therefore,
in such case static non-standard shell in /bin makes little or
no difference as user has to attend console anyway.

-Maxim

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message