From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 15 11:12:56 1996 Return-Path: owner-stable Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id LAA16275 for stable-outgoing; Thu, 15 Feb 1996 11:12:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.17]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA16262 Thu, 15 Feb 1996 11:12:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP id LAA07155; Thu, 15 Feb 1996 11:12:53 -0800 Message-Id: <199602151912.LAA07155@Root.COM> X-Authentication-Warning: implode.Root.COM: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: Nate Williams cc: michael butler , stable@freebsd.org, wollman@freebsd.org Subject: Re: arp and async problems In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 15 Feb 1996 11:21:43 MST." <199602151821.LAA00383@rocky.sri.MT.net> From: David Greenman Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 11:12:52 -0800 Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk >> > > There is no way I can afford to split out 14 subnets with only one address >> > > in each to support a DNS and WWW server nor is it practical to stick that >> > > many ethernet cards into the box. >> >> > Why split it out? Why not stick all of the alias' on the same network, >> > so that the IP address are relevant on your primary network? >> >> So you're telling me that I can now use .. >> >> ifconfig ep0 inet 202.12.127.225 netmask 255.255.255.240 >> ifconfig ep0 inet 202.12.127.226 alias netmask 255.255.255.240 >> ifconfig ep0 inet 202.12.127.227 alias netmask 255.255.255.240 >> : >> : >> >> .. this didn't work before (I tried it), does it now ? I think the above should be: ifconfig ep0 inet 202.12.127.225 netmask 255.255.255.240 ifconfig ep0 inet 202.12.127.226 netmask 255.255.255.255 alias ifconfig ep0 inet 202.12.127.227 netmask 255.255.255.255 alias -DG David Greenman Core Team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project