From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Mar 31 08:45:36 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA17719 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Tue, 31 Mar 1998 08:45:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA17712 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 1998 08:45:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (ala-ca36-50.ix.netcom.com [207.93.42.242]) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA26839; Tue, 31 Mar 1998 08:45:12 -0800 (PST) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.8/8.6.9) id IAA17635; Tue, 31 Mar 1998 08:43:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 1998 08:43:55 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199803311643.IAA17635@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: shimon@simon-shapiro.org CC: deischen@iworks.InterWorks.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: (message from Simon Shapiro on Tue, 31 Mar 1998 08:46:25 -0800 (PST)) Subject: Re: editor/nedit patching fails From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * I'll comply, but, in case I dod not make myself clear, I am buiding these * packages under current, not stable. My procedure is simple, ans I belive That's why I said "things like `patch' shouldn't be different" in the very part of my message you quoted. By the way, you can check packages-current for the -current packages build by Justin and Co., although they don't rebuild the packages as often as I do. * If that fails, on my machine, and not on yours, does it prove the port to * be correct? So far it has only proven that you screwed up something. :> * The ``it works here'' is very useful, up to a point. It's all about the signal-to-noise ratio, you know. :) Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message