From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 28 20:11:37 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8838B16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 20:11:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [216.201.118.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67CAB43D5E for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 20:11:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0F0A60E7 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:11:23 -0600 (CST) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 94754-02 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:11:19 -0600 (CST) Received: by makeworld.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DEA7F60E2; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:11:18 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD94D60DA for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:11:18 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:11:18 -0600 (CST) From: RacerX To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <956831073.20050228205253@wanadoo.fr> Message-ID: <20050228140846.Y94755@makeworld.com> References: <42224A80.9010109@wanadoo.es> <956831073.20050228205253@wanadoo.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV 0.75.1/amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) at makeworld.com - Isn't it ironic Subject: Re: Installation instructions for Firefox somewhere? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 20:11:37 -0000 On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Ted Mittelstaedt writes: > >> I agree Ramiro, I've setup dozens and dozens of different SCSI setups, >> and I think that his problem is hardware, such as incorrect >> termination, a bad scsi cable, bad connectors on the cable, or an >> incompatible SCSI/disk combination (which is rare, but it does happen) > > No. The machine ran flawlessly for eight years with the current hardware > configuration, no errors, no data loss, even under the heaviest loads. > There's nothing wrong with the hardware. > The hardware has ran for over 8 years - you don't think that after 8 years its going to show wear and tear? I do/would. We as humans are not perfect - so that means the things we make can't be perfect either. They will break down, even die. I suspect that if you put in new hardware, the issues will remove themselves. Best regards, Chris