From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Mar 10 14:43:11 2014
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 028CA2ED;
 Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:43:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx.critical.ch (mx.critical.ch [IPv6:2001:1620:f05::1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85BE814F;
 Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:43:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wiggles.critical.ch (snow.ethz.ch [129.132.80.16])
 (authenticated bits=0)
 by mx.critical.ch (8.14.7/8.14.7/critical-1.0) with ESMTP id s2AEh6rR056050;
 Mon, 10 Mar 2014 15:43:06 +0100 (CET)
 (envelope-from ehaupt@critical.ch)
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 15:43:06 +0100
From: Emanuel Haupt <ehaupt@critical.ch>
To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r346114 - head/devel/p4.el
Message-Id: <20140310154306.8c89f238ed6569f05981a9c6@critical.ch>
In-Reply-To: <20140310143515.GB92282@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201402260657.s1Q6vEsH059562@svn.freebsd.org>
 <BEE32AF42CDC7ED09B7234F0@atuin.in.mat.cc>
 <20140226123420.f5c0d0ff40b404a70334da4b@FreeBSD.org>
 <20140310072423.GC11693@FreeBSD.org>
 <f8e85ff21f349babc099b00d8207a8b2@apnoea.adamw.org>
 <3D82157DD87FC9C0C7724278@ogg.in.absolight.net>
 <20140310141659.GG11135@gahrfit.gahr.ch>
 <20140310143515.GB92282@FreeBSD.org>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.2)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org,
 ports-committers@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head
 <svn-ports-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:43:11 -0000

Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 03:16:59PM +0100, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
> > ports-policy-change-announce@ comes to mind :) Has anybody else
> > ever felt the desire to get notified whenever a policy is updated?
> > Just to avoid having to skim through commit logs.
> 
> It's getting a bit ridiculuos, no?
>
> Guys, nothing was discussed thus far which does not come naturally
> from common sense.  Certainly there are few special cases that
> require deeper analysis (e.g. proper, legally-clean LICENSE
> handling), but from what I see, most of "please don't/do
> this-or-that" stuff comes from negligence rather than deliberate
> dissent from PHB or common practices.  If every committer would
> review *entire* Makefile before 'svn ci', there would be presumably
> less messages on the lists. :)

This is rediculous. I am currently trying to bring down the count of
unstaged ports. If I see things right away I will fix them with it but
asking me/us to fix EVERY possible flaw is like saying: Just because
you fix the tire you're responsible to fix every other part of the car.

Emanuel