From owner-freebsd-chat Wed Jul 2 12:43:41 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA21923 for chat-outgoing; Wed, 2 Jul 1997 12:43:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (eivind@bitbox.follo.net [194.198.43.36]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA21914; Wed, 2 Jul 1997 12:43:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.5/8.7.3) id VAA22302; Wed, 2 Jul 1997 21:39:51 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 2 Jul 1997 21:39:51 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <199707021939.VAA22302@bitbox.follo.net> From: Eivind Eklund To: Narvi CC: jkh@freebsd.org, chat@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Narvi's message of Wed, 2 Jul 1997 16:37:08 +0300 (EEST) Subject: Re: Why Not Make tcsh the default shell? References: <22438.867842653@time.cdrom.com> Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk [Narvi AKA Sander] > Well, so if I write a quick and dirty tcl/tk tutorial to the FreeBSD > packages, I will not be shot on sight and someone will take a look at it? Well, it might become a port... TK isn't a part of the base system - we have a bit of a catch-22 here, as most of the things for making ports easy seems to be put in the ports... Perhaps if you also create a special menu-item etc for sysinstall and send Jordan the diff's? Eivind.