From owner-freebsd-questions  Wed Apr  5  8:33:43 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from blackhelicopters.org (geburah.blackhelicopters.org [209.69.178.18])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A32E37BD71
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Wed,  5 Apr 2000 08:33:40 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org)
Received: (from mwlucas@localhost)
	by blackhelicopters.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA81280;
	Wed, 5 Apr 2000 11:32:54 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from mwlucas)
From: Michael Lucas <mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org>
Message-Id: <200004051532.LAA81280@blackhelicopters.org>
Subject: Re: Fresh cvsup, make world, system too old for ports?
In-Reply-To: <20000405143324.F66957@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk> from Ben Smithurst at "Apr 5, 2000  2:33:24 pm"
To: ben@scientia.demon.co.uk (Ben Smithurst)
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 11:32:54 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> > This is a clean 4.0 system, installed as 4.0-release just last week,
> > and supped to -stable.  It's not an upgrade from 3.x.
> > 
> > Don't tell me we need a 4.0-release to 4.0-stable upgrade kit???  I
> > didn't see one on ftp2.freebsd.org yesterday.
> 
> ah, OK, ignore me then. :-) All I can suggest is kludging around it for now,
> I'm not sure what the real solution is.
> 
> # date +%Y%m%d > /var/db/port.mkversion

Worked beautifully, thanks!  A kludge with a .0 release is just fine,
IMHO.  ;)

==ml


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message