From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Dec 17 05:58:24 2014
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
 id DD761B3F; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 05:58:24 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 05:58:24 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r374800 - head/Mk/Uses
Message-ID: <20141217055824.GA59186@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201412161206.sBGC6fa5045717@svn.freebsd.org>
 <54902709.9090801@marino.st>
 <71EBD6FD6D89266B6651554A@ogg.in.absolight.net>
 <20141216133802.GA27647@ravenloft.kiev.ua>
 <5B209A4BD7689CD74744CFA7@ogg.in.absolight.net>
 <20141216141320.GA28332@ravenloft.kiev.ua>
 <20141216142422.GA38033@FreeBSD.org> <5490DFDB.5080000@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5490DFDB.5080000@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Cc: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org,
 svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org,
 Alex Kozlov <ak@FreeBSD.org>
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head
 <svn-ports-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 05:58:25 -0000

On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 07:43:55PM -0600, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> As a vendor who maintains a forked ports tree, I despise this commit and
> all of the ones below. It makes carrying out customizations very
> difficult. Yes, it doesn't *look* good on the eyes, but reindenting on
> such large files with large history maintained by > 1 person is a sin.
> 
> [ ... lots of commits from bapt@ WRT tabspace: 8 ... ]

Agreed.  I was surprised that there was no discussion on this matter at all.
I know we generally had been relaxing "approve required" policies for many
things, and Mk/bsd.*.mk et al. are "owned" by portmgr@, but I don't think
it implies that any portmgr@ member can just come and make controversial
changes like this to his liking.  Lots of people work with these files, and
they should've been asked.

./danfe