From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 14:10:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63347106566B for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:10:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 518E28FC08 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:10:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0BEADVO042877 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:10:13 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q0BEADFF042876; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:10:13 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:10:13 GMT Message-Id: <201201111410.q0BEADFF042876@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Kurt Jaeger Cc: Subject: Re: ports/164014: [patch update] security/chntpw 100627 -> 110511 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Kurt Jaeger List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:10:13 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/164014; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Kurt Jaeger To: Buganini Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org, fbsd-ports@opsec.eu Subject: Re: ports/164014: [patch update] security/chntpw 100627 -> 110511 Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:03:32 +0100 Hi! > Are you sure the binary could work correctly? I tested reged on an amd64 and had identical crashes 8-) See my error report to pnh@pogostick.net I forwarded to you. > It may be able to be built and executed, but I'm not sure if it can > manipulate hive correctly. I had no chance to test it en detail. There's one thing, a few warnings during compilation, all of them like: ntreg.c: In function 'parse_db': ntreg.c:660: warning: format '%04x' expects type 'unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'long int' I'm not sure this is critical. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 8 years to go !