From owner-cvs-all Fri Jul 13 3:16:10 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from axl.seasidesoftware.co.za (axl.seasidesoftware.co.za [196.31.7.201]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C559837B401; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 03:16:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sheldonh@starjuice.net) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.seasidesoftware.co.za) by axl.seasidesoftware.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.31 #1) id 15Kzzz-0002o0-00; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 12:16:39 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: Anton Berezin Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www Makefile ports/www/p5-CGI.pm Makefile distinfo pkg-comment pkg-descr pkg-plist In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 13 Jul 2001 12:02:40 +0200." <20010713120240.C46563@heechee.tobez.org> Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 12:16:39 +0200 Message-ID: <10787.995019399@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 13 Jul 2001 12:02:40 +0200, Anton Berezin wrote: > Your only reason in favor of p5-CGI seems to be the fact that there are > no other p5 ports named .pm. How is the casual observer supposed to interpret the presence of '.pm' appended to the port directory name of a p5- port, as distinct from other p5- port drectory names that have no such suffix? You're just introducing an inconsistency we can do without. > How do we solve this? As already explained: p5-CGI -> p5-CGI-modules p5-CGI.pm -> p5-CGI Now's probably not the time to repeat my suggestion to simply update the modules in the base system, is it? I suppose not. Instead, let me ask how Perl5 knows to try the CGI.pm in ${PREFIX} instead of the one supplied by the base system. :-) Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message