From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Dec 24 14:18:56 2013
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6630216E;
 Tue, 24 Dec 2013 14:18:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from prod2.absolight.net (mx3.absolight.net
 [IPv6:2a01:678:2:100::25])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FF441434;
 Tue, 24 Dec 2013 14:18:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72E18BDC2E;
 Tue, 24 Dec 2013 15:18:52 +0100 (CET)
Received: from gw.in.absolight.net (gw-ecl.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.69])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "gw.in.absolight.net",
 Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified))
 by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5FA90BDC24;
 Tue, 24 Dec 2013 15:18:52 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ogg.in.absolight.net (ogg.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.239])
 by gw.in.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3F826113;
 Tue, 24 Dec 2013 15:18:51 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by ogg.in.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50C7466D4515;
 Tue, 24 Dec 2013 15:18:51 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 15:18:51 +0100
From: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>
To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>, Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r337346 - branches/2014Q1/audio/ardour/files
Message-ID: <5B9F108459A3A26926CBB6AE@ogg.in.absolight.net>
In-Reply-To: <20131224135023.GA94117@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201312241254.rBOCsX8C087273@svn.freebsd.org>
 <20131224135023.GA94117@FreeBSD.org>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Cc: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-branches@freebsd.org,
 ports-committers@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree <svn-ports-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-all>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-all>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 14:18:56 -0000

+--On 24 d=C3=A9cembre 2013 13:50:24 +0000 Alexey Dokuchaev =
<danfe@FreeBSD.org>
wrote:
| On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 12:54:33PM +0000, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
|> New Revision: 337346
|> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/337346
|>=20
|> Log:
|>   MFH: r337319
|=20
| IMHO it should've been committed as part of r337343.  There is nothing
| wrong with separating complicated fix into several commits (in head/),
| but if they are related, it makes more sense to merge them together, no?

Yes, I could have done that, but the mfh script doesn't take more than one
revision to merge at a time, and I did not notice until after the facts
that there were two commits to the same port.

If the original committer had asked for the merge, had gotten approval, and
had done it himself, he sure would have done it like you said ;-)

--=20
Mathieu Arnold