From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Jan 3 19:49:13 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C9FA37B401 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2003 19:49:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail5.atl.registeredsite.com (mail5.atl.registeredsite.com [64.224.219.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4921343EC5 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2003 19:49:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from admin@asarian-host.net) Received: from asarian-host.net (asarian-host.net [216.122.74.112]) by mail5.atl.registeredsite.com (8.12.2/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h043n8FE021647 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2003 22:49:09 -0500 Comments: To protect the identity of the sender, certain header fields are either not shown, or masked. Anonymous email addresses for asarians can be requested by filling in the appropriate form at: https://asarian-host.net/cgi-bin/signup.cgi Received: (from root@localhost) by asarian-host.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) id h043n8t50864 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 4 Jan 2003 04:49:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from admin@asarian-host.net) Posted-Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 02:17:38 +0100 (CET) From: Mark Message-Id: <200301030117.H031HZS41668@asarian-host.net> Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 02:17:27 +0100 X-Authenticated-Sender: admin@asarian-host.net Subject: Re: FreeBSD Stability X-Trace: oue1oWZaMMexhDrAM/gn0EER3kbNw/3EXFup6/VusyB9gkEfDuLk1SRhgAl4qHiZ X-Complaints-To: abuse@asarian-host.net X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we are unable to process your complaint Organization: Asarian-host To: "Marcus Reid" , "Mike Hogsett" Cc: , References: <200212170023.gBH0Nvlu000764@beast.csl.sri.com> <20030103000232.GA52181@blazingdot.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Auth: Asarian-host PGP signature iQEVAwUAPhTksjFqW1BleBN9AQGlegf/dYXZ9b5PTMhZOS6bMSMVZNg/Zd0k91yX 3PNX+d4Qkx7nUy/c6l+Du+0PUNQ6QMs0YK5/9rdcsORbthznYpQlgt+lEny4DaVN LXWRIGys5P2bgcu/3A/CBOORM91Uty7uVdSzKo0qzNP8AAQTHqqaRyni+C/P6bJ/ EAos7otXbEjrbTcb+ejmfctzKp9ryqebSvHat347SrVfjMtg44TYBMHmb0cN2OEh NKXC7hl3fCV4/etsJ3/MFOJkZuMv8IAS9tJKC3QcBq+3smBKqLvLMdNYRRNf9rk5 xS9CIZBOddQFbP95DwsvF3FuXeR2srGazzaxfRuTMUNkC5tm1QvQug== =LgNh Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marcus Reid" To: "Mike Hogsett" Cc: ; Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 1:02 AM Subject: Re: FreeBSD Stability > I like to point people in the direction of: > > http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html > > The list is dominated by FreeBSD machines with > uptimes of longer than 1000 days. What is it that makes people rave about the longest uptime? To me, this is just a list of sites whose admins have neglected to perform the necessary upgrade-maintenances, seemingly for almost three years even. To me, this is just a list of potentially vulnerable sites. - Mark To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message