From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Apr 1 17:12:25 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from thehousleys.net (frenchknot.ne.mediaone.net [24.147.224.201]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32B9E37B8CD for ; Sat, 1 Apr 2000 17:12:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jim@thehousleys.net) Received: from thehousleys.net (baby.int.thehousleys.net [192.168.0.24]) by thehousleys.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA36804 for ; Sat, 1 Apr 2000 20:12:19 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <38E69E73.4CFF971C@thehousleys.net> Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2000 20:12:19 -0500 From: James Housley Organization: The Housleys dot Net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Building 4.x on 3.x Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I got an old pentium 100 laptop that I want to play around with 4.x on. It's disk to too small to hold the source tree, obj tree and useful programs. Is it okay to do the buildworld on my 3.4-Stable server with more memory, speed, disk, etc.... Then nfs mount the src & obj trees to do the install world and build kernel?? Since this is how a source upgrade would be done my guess is yes, but I just want to check. Jim -- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message