From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Apr 24 11:59:53 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A68D37B400 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 11:59:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from owt.com (owt-207-41-94-232.owt.com [207.41.94.232]) by rutger.owt.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA06616; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 11:57:43 -0700 Message-ID: <3CC70027.8050306@owt.com> Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 11:57:43 -0700 From: Kent Stewart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011128 Netscape6/6.2.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us, es-mx MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Will Andrews Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP: misc/kde3-i18n* [was Re: HOLY COW! Ports grew by 130MB!] References: <200204241418.11960.lauri@kde.org> <20020424131117.GL556@squall.waterspout.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Will Andrews wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 02:18:11PM +0200, Lauri Watts wrote: > >>Ok. What am I missing? >> >> /usr/ports/misc du -sh >> 10M . >> >>(and that's after the repocopies) >> >>Each one is quite tiny, and most of it is packing list: >> /usr/ports/misc/kde3-i18n-sv du -sh >> 72K . >> >>42 x 72K = 3ish megs total new stuff. >> >>Are you mirroring the entire cvs repository, instead of cvsupping? on a 28.8 >>kb line? *why*? >> > > Probably because he prefers to do cvs operations on a local > connection instead of over the network. It's a good strategy > for people on slow or expensive links, even better than > cvsuping the actual contents.. especially for developers. There > are still lots of parts of the world where disk space is >100 > times cheaper than bandwidth... and there are only a few where > bandwidth is actually cheaper than disk. =) > > In any case, Joe Karthauser (cvs@ person) has removed all but > the latest revisions on all of these plist's which should get rid > of about 125MB or so of the extra data. I don't have any regret > about losing the history considering what is gained. > > Sorry to all the people who downloaded this stuff before it > became apparent. I hadn't realized how big the RCS file was. There are times when I think that INDEX should be cleaned up. Everyone is basically supposed to cvsup and portsdb -uU to rebuild it. The cvs copy is now 10x larger than the file itself and cvsuping downloading INDEX can take as long as the cvsuping the rest of ports-all. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message