From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 29 17:48:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5822106566C; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 17:48:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Received: from vps.hungerhost.com (vps.hungerhost.com [216.38.53.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B312D8FC18; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 17:48:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [209.249.190.124] (port=58940 helo=gnnmac.hudson-trading.com) by vps.hungerhost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SkfHi-0006Fw-1s; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 13:47:10 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1280) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: George Neville-Neil In-Reply-To: <1340991359.60778.YahooMailClassic@web113502.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 13:47:00 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <1340991359.60778.YahooMailClassic@web113502.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> To: pfg@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1280) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - vps.hungerhost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - neville-neil.com Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, obrien@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r237624 - in head: cddl/contrib/opensolaris/cmd/dtrace/test/tst/common/llquantize cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libdtrace/common sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/dtrace sys/cddl/c... X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 17:48:26 -0000 On Jun 29, 2012, at 13:35 , Pedro Giffuni wrote: > (Sorry for top-posting] >=20 > Actually ... >=20 > David pointed out a fundamental flaw on my part. >=20 > These are new files under a non-BSD license. Even when > they are only scripts used for testing I shouldn't have > brought them in without -core approval. >=20 > I will delete them right away and core shall decide > afterwards if and how they can be brought in. >=20 Are the files under a CDDL license? Since that's the point of where you = added them I don't think that that should be an issue. The issue comes when we = might ship CDDL code by default, but these are tests and so that should not be = a problem. If they're not CDDL then that is an issue. Best, George