From owner-freebsd-arch Wed May 30 6:24:57 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0BEB37B422 for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 06:24:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au) Received: from bde.zeta.org.au (bde.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.102]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA14052; Wed, 30 May 2001 23:24:43 +1000 Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 23:23:09 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-Sender: bde@besplex.bde.org To: John Polstra Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG, kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: PAM, S/Key and authentication schemes. In-Reply-To: <200105290244.f4T2iNP21562@vashon.polstra.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 28 May 2001, John Polstra wrote: > In article <20010528174728.A39588@xor.obsecurity.org>, > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > We also compile all of the PAM modules included in the base system > > into a static libpam which allows statically-linked binaries to work, > > up to a point (they won't work if the system administrator tries to > > use a third-party PAM module) > > We used to do this and probably still do. But I haven't tried it > lately. I build the entire world static (except for the broken perl part), so I try this (without third-party PAM modules) most days. Support for this in -unpatched-current is only broken in a few places now (including in a central place so it may be broken everywhere). Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message