From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 14 05:09:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D59C216A4CE for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 05:09:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5CC543D49 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 05:09:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j0E596CV017473; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 21:09:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j0E596lm017406; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 21:09:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 21:09:06 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Paul Allen Message-ID: <20050114050906.GE29445@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20050103231847.GJ22456@philemon.caltech.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050103231847.GJ22456@philemon.caltech.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5-STABLE or -CURRENT? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 05:09:08 -0000 On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 03:18:47PM -0800, Paul Allen wrote: > I had experienced some issues with 5.3-Release vis-a-vis bad > bounce buffer panics. > > Am I correct in my read of the mailing list that 5.3-Stable > Resolves these issues? Yes. > Additionally, I was wondering if it was regarded as better > to run some snapshot of current. You should only run 6-CURRENT if you're really prepaired to deal with what -CURRENT is. > I've heard some off hand > remarks along the lines of "everyone who is running on amd64 > should be running -CURRENT." Is this true? No it is not true. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)