From owner-freebsd-current Mon Jun 10 18:42:42 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA08733 for current-outgoing; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 18:42:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id SAA08726 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 18:42:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.17]) by who.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.11) with ESMTP id SAA20186 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 18:42:37 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Root.COM (8.7.5/8.6.5) with SMTP id SAA18915; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 18:41:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199606110141.SAA18915@Root.COM> X-Authentication-Warning: implode.Root.COM: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: Matt Day cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, taob@io.org Subject: Re: Kernel panic in fsync, 2.2-960501-SNAP In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 10 Jun 1996 18:09:24 PDT." <199606110109.SAA22935@sting.artisoft.com> From: David Greenman Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM Date: Mon, 10 Jun 1996 18:41:53 -0700 Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >It looks like your panic could very well have been caused by a bug >I reported several months ago. It has not been fixed yet in either >tree. Here is my original bug report: > >> From mday Mon Feb 5 03:01:27 1996 Thanks for the patch, Matt. It looks fine. Sorry your previous bug report didn't get the attention it deserved. It looks like the timing was probably bad - Feb 5 would have been right after Usenix, and I had about 3000 pieces of email to read and respond to when I got back. -DG David Greenman Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project