From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 19 10:26:42 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 657AF1065670 for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:26:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A37308FC12 for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:26:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.101]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id NAA03518; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:26:39 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Message-ID: <4A3B67DE.6080200@icyb.net.ua> Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:26:38 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090406) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Backman References: <949B5884-5303-4EFF-AC7D-293640FFA012@exscape.org> <0C235698-3ED2-4AE9-A7D1-5DC56D8324A4@exscape.org> <200905212129.47892.mel.flynn+fbsd.current@mailing.thruhere.net> <44F486FA-E798-448D-BE31-F7A51EF1F612@exscape.org> <60173AF0-7E54-4BDD-8927-0DADA9DAD1B4@exscape.org> <20090522200306.GE2630@atarininja.org> <20090617225849.GB28509@atarininja.org> <4A3A1D27.4010802@icyb.net.ua> <4A3A2B88.60009@icyb.net.ua> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD current Subject: Re: DTrace panic while probing syscall::open (and possibly many others) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:26:42 -0000 on 18/06/2009 16:55 Thomas Backman said the following: > No. :/ > The kernel.debug was gone, and so I deleted the core as well, since I > had changed the kernel code since the recompile (that *would* break > debugging it, yes? I can't just recompile a new, changed one hoping it > will still debug properly, right?). Maybe at a later time. Ok. In general I have a feeling that there might be some bug in management of "scratch buffer" that is used to hold temporary results (like target of copyinstr). -- Andriy Gapon