From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Mar 5 3: 3:53 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from stjohn.stjohn.ac.th (stjohn.stjohn.ac.th [202.21.144.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E9EB37B400 for ; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 03:03:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from tulip ([203.151.134.104]) by stjohn.stjohn.ac.th (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA29506; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 18:02:32 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20020305180304.007c7530@stjohn.stjohn.ac.th> X-Sender: mcrogerm@stjohn.stjohn.ac.th X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 18:03:04 +0700 To: Kevin Golding From: Roger Merritt Subject: Re: Portupgrade Problem? Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 07:23 PM 3/3/02 +0000, you wrote: >In message , S Roberts > writes >>I'll certainly try your suggestion later on this evening. But could I verify >>your advisory (thr order thereof, that is): >> >>1] Run 'pkg_deinstall -f pkg_tarup'. >>2] Go to /usr/ports/sysutils/pkg_tarup and install it from there. >>3] Run 'pkgdb -F ' to sort out the ruby conflict > >Yep. Steps 1 and 2 will correct the location for pkg_tarup and step 3 >makes sure your install ports all make sense. > >If you do step 3 first then it'll query what you want to do with >pkg_tarup. It is possible to correct pkg_tarup at this stage it's just >that I feel better reinstalling it. > >>One thing though (bear with me please) from what you said: >>" 'pkgdb -F' - it should show any concerns and advise you on methods to >>resolve them, but sort out portupgrade like below first. Once this is run >>you should only have one copy of Ruby installed and no dependency worries". >> >>Do I take it that you meant that after: >>=> Run de-install / install (new directory) for pkg_tarup >> >>=> Run 'portupgrade -R portupgrade' to upgrade portupgrade >> >>*Then* >>=> Attempt pkgdb -F to resolve the issue of conflicting ruby entries >> >>Please let me know if the above looks okay to you. > >That's what I was getting at, just translated into better English :-) > >>Sorry if I come across >>pedantic over this, but I want to be sure about what I'm doing here. > >'Sokay, I probably should have woken up a little more before I wrote my >mail. Not that I'm capable of making no sense or anything :-) > >Kevin > OK, you aroused my interest enough to cause me to try to upgrade my portsupgrade, and I never would have gotten as far as I have without your advice about pkg_tarup. It enabled me to resolve the conflict when I ran pkgdb -F by just entering the new location of the port in the database. *However* the big problem seems to be (at least for me) that there *is no* ruby-uri in the ports tree. I'm baffled, because when I went to /usr/ports and ran 'make search key="ruby-uri"' it came back with a list of ports that depend on it *and* a listing for it as /usr/ports/net/ruby-uri -- and THERE IS NO such directory. So I cvsup'ed my ports and there still isn't any /usr/ports/net/ruby-uri there. So what's the next step? If it's been removed from the ports tree, what do I do about all the dependencies? -- Roger You're only young once, but you can be immature forever! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message