From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 2 02:22:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D71D16A401; Tue, 2 May 2006 02:22:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C67343D7D; Tue, 2 May 2006 02:21:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k422LjKB035880; Mon, 1 May 2006 20:21:46 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <4456C244.8020509@samsco.org> Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 20:21:56 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051230 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sam Leffler References: <200605010015.k410FDef095624@repoman.freebsd.org> <4456B86D.2080207@FreeBSD.org> <4456BC5A.2090308@samsco.org> <4456C049.2020805@errno.com> In-Reply-To: <4456C049.2020805@errno.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, SUBJ_HAS_SPACES autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: Maxim Sobolev , src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man4 Makefile rr232x.4 src/sys/dev/rr232x LICENSE README amd64-elf.rr232x_lib.o.uu array.h him.h himfuncs.h hptintf.h i386-elf.rr232x_lib.o.uu ldm.h list.h os_bsd.c os_bsd.h osm.h osm_bsd.c rr232x_config.c ... X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 02:22:01 -0000 Sam Leffler wrote: > Scott Long wrote: > >> The architecture of the driver makes this a request hard to do. I >> don't like it, but there is precedence already with the ath driver. > > > I'm guessing you're referring to ath bailing if the hal could not be > attached or the card otherwise setup? If so the card was actually > recognized and failure to complete the attach is totally separate. > > ath doesn't print anything during probe. > > Sam I thought that the ath hal printed a line early in boot with the version number. Scott