From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 14:34:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FFAE16A4CE for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 14:34:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.speakeasy.net (mail2.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C1C743D60 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 14:34:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 29737 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2004 22:34:07 -0000 Received: from dsl027-160-063.atl1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO server.baldwin.cx) ([216.27.160.63]) (envelope-sender ) encrypted SMTP for ; 20 Jan 2004 22:34:07 -0000 Received: from 10.50.40.205 (gw1.twc.weather.com [216.133.140.1]) by server.baldwin.cx (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0KMY0M2015071; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 17:34:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) From: John Baldwin To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 17:30:58 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <9810.1074634398@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <9810.1074634398@critter.freebsd.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401201730.58556.jhb@FreeBSD.org> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/alpha support.s src/sys/i386/i386 swtch.s src/sys/kern kern_shutdown.c src/sys/sys systm.h X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 22:34:45 -0000 On Tuesday 20 January 2004 04:33 pm, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > I suggest you and everybody else calm down and let dust settle for > a couple of days, maybe other people should have a chance to say > their opinion. If there is a clear concensus that this is bad > (maybe somebody neutral should take a count ?), then we'll back it > out. Sounds fair to me. I was keying off what I have seen so far of the thread in committers@. Partly it seemed that you had implied that myself and others who objected didn't care about how users felt or didn't want to bother in fixing reported bugs and that stung a bit. Nevertheless, the tone of my e-mail was quite a bit over the top, and I should have cooled off a bit more before replying. -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org