From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Sep  6 14:46:40 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E7FB86
 for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Fri,  6 Sep 2013 14:46:40 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org)
Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFE75227C
 for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Fri,  6 Sep 2013 14:46:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124])
 by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B95E4B922;
 Fri,  6 Sep 2013 10:46:38 -0400 (EDT)
From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: /usr/lib/private
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 10:17:00 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110714-p28; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; )
References: <86zjrut4an.fsf@nine.des.no>
 <CAMGEAwByA5ewSD=5nO4GyYdnAEWyJgczQsb_eOUAScMLcfJRJQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130905100058.GR41229@kib.kiev.ua>
In-Reply-To: <20130905100058.GR41229@kib.kiev.ua>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201309061017.00306.jhb@freebsd.org>
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Fri, 06 Sep 2013 10:46:38 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>,
 Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav <des@des.no>,
 Jonathan Anderson <jonathan.anderson@ieee.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 14:46:41 -0000

On Thursday, September 05, 2013 6:00:58 am Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 08:41:29AM +0100, Jonathan Anderson wrote:
> > Is there any reason not to make it /private/usr/lib (or
> > /private/usr/lib/platform)? I could see us wanting a /private/usr/include
> > in the future for e.g. LLVM/Clang headers that things in base (e.g.
> > lldb) might use but whose stability we don't want to be responsible for.
> > 
> The libraries (and headers) are not needed in the single-user mode, and
> we are still trying to maintain the / and /usr split.

Would /usr/private/lib work without requiring rtld changes?  Looks like
it would not.  However, you could install a stock /etc/libmap32.conf 
that mapped /usr/lib/private or /usr/private/lib to the relevant 32-bit
path.

-- 
John Baldwin