From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Dec 11 22:50:12 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B3C716A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 11 Dec 2004 22:50:12 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 493C443D66
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 11 Dec 2004 22:50:11 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iBBMo7DP099911;
	Sat, 11 Dec 2004 23:50:08 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
To: Mohan Srinivasan <mohan_srinivasan@yahoo.com>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 11 Dec 2004 14:39:52 PST."
             <20041211223952.67613.qmail@web80601.mail.yahoo.com> 
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 23:50:07 +0100
Message-ID: <99910.1102805407@critter.freebsd.dk>
Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: NFS df bug... 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 22:50:12 -0000

In message <20041211223952.67613.qmail@web80601.mail.yahoo.com>, Mohan Srinivas
an writes:
>Among the changes that we committed, only nfs_vfsops.c:1.162 seems
>like a likely suspect.
>
>Can someone who can readily reproduce this back out that change and
>test ?

I tried that already but it didn't solve it.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.